Loading...
Loading...
Zebby Matthews
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
5.08
BABIP
0.251
K%
20.5
BB%
6.4
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 6.69 | 37.2 | 43 | 11 | 1.65 | 11 |
| 2025 | 16 | 5 | 6 | 5.56 | 79.1 | 88 |
G
10
GS
10
W
4
L
5
ERA
4.43
IP
61.0
SO
51
BB
16
Hits
55
HR
13
WHIP
1.16
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Minnesota Twins | 7.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Minnesota Twins | 6.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1.38 |
| - | Minnesota Twins | 6.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2.37 |
| 24 |
| 1.49 |
| 12 |
| 2026 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 4.43 | 61.0 | 51 | 16 | 1.16 | 13 |
| - | Minnesota Twins | 4.1 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 4.63 |
| - | Minnesota Twins | 7.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4.15 |