Loading...
Loading...
Noah Schultz
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
4.84
BABIP
0.277
K%
20.7
BB%
9.6
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 19 | 4 | 9 | 5.57 | 74.1 | 67 | 31 | 1.33 | 11 |
G
19
GS
14
W
4
L
9
ERA
5.57
IP
74.1
SO
67
BB
31
Hits
68
HR
11
WHIP
1.33
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Chicago White Sox | 4.1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6.23 |
| - | Chicago White Sox | 5.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 3.86 |
| - | Chicago White Sox | 6.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 3.52 |
| - | Chicago White Sox | 6.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2.53 |
| - | Chicago White Sox | 3.2 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4.68 |