Loading...
Loading...
Paul Skenes
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
3.02
BABIP
0.275
K%
30.1
BB%
5.6
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | 11 | 3 | 1.96 | 133.0 | 170 | 32 | 0.95 | 10 |
| 2025 | 32 | 10 | 10 | 1.97 | 187.2 | 216 |
G
18
GS
18
W
6
L
8
ERA
3.62
IP
97.0
SO
119
BB
22
Hits
76
HR
11
WHIP
1.01
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 0.2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 67.50 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 5.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 9.53 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 6.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 5.25 |
| 42 |
| 0.95 |
| 11 |
| 2026 | 18 | 6 | 8 | 3.62 | 97.0 | 119 | 22 | 1.01 | 11 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 6.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 4.00 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 4.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3.27 |