Loading...
Loading...
Paul Skenes
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
2.65
BABIP
0.203
K%
30.3
BB%
3.8
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | 11 | 3 | 1.96 | 133.0 | 170 | 32 | 0.95 | 10 |
| 2025 | 32 | 10 | 10 | 1.97 | 187.2 | 216 |
G
10
GS
10
W
6
L
3
ERA
2.62
IP
55.0
SO
63
BB
8
Hits
31
HR
5
WHIP
0.71
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 0.2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 67.50 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 5.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 9.53 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 6.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 5.25 |
| 42 |
| 0.95 |
| 11 |
| 2026 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 2.62 | 55.0 | 63 | 8 | 0.71 | 5 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 6.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 4.00 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 4.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3.27 |