Loading...
Loading...
Daniel Palencia
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
3.41
BABIP
0.346
K%
26.2
BB%
9.5
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 27 | 5 | 3 | 4.45 | 28.1 | 33 | 14 | 1.27 | 3 |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 6.14 | 14.2 | 16 |
G
11
GS
0
W
1
L
0
ERA
1.86
IP
9.2
SO
11
BB
4
Hits
10
HR
1
WHIP
1.45
SV
3
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Chicago Cubs | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Chicago Cubs | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Chicago Cubs | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 12 |
| 1.77 |
| 0 |
| 2025 | 54 | 1 | 6 | 2.91 | 52.2 | 61 | 16 | 1.14 | 5 |
| 2026 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1.86 | 9.2 | 11 | 4 | 1.45 | 1 |
| - | Chicago Cubs | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Chicago Cubs | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 |