Loading...
Loading...
Ian Seymour
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
4.1
BABIP
0.232
K%
26.1
BB%
9.1
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19 | 4 | 3 | 3.63 | 57.0 | 64 | 19 | 1.18 | 5 |
| 2026 | 31 | 5 | 1 | 4.02 | 56.0 | 60 |
G
31
GS
4
W
5
L
1
ERA
4.02
IP
56.0
SO
60
BB
21
Hits
40
HR
8
WHIP
1.09
SV
2
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 0.0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -.-- |
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 16.88 |
| 21 |
| 1.09 |
| 8 |
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 1.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13.50 |
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |