Loading...
Loading...
Brandon Eisert
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
3.67
BABIP
0.311
K%
25.9
BB%
7.4
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4.05 | 6.2 | 2 | 4 | 1.35 | 0 |
| 2025 | 72 | 3 | 8 | 4.39 | 69.2 | 74 |
G
40
GS
4
W
3
L
3
ERA
5.52
IP
44.0
SO
49
BB
14
Hits
43
HR
6
WHIP
1.30
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Chicago White Sox | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 18.00 |
| - | Chicago White Sox | 1.1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 15.43 |
| - | Chicago White Sox | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10.80 |
| 25 |
| 1.44 |
| 12 |
| 2026 | 25 | 2 | 1 | 5.93 | 27.1 | 32 | 8 | 1.24 | 6 |
| 2026 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 4.86 | 16.2 | 17 | 6 | 1.38 | 0 |
| 2026 | 40 | 3 | 3 | 5.52 | 44.0 | 49 | 14 | 1.30 | 6 |
| - | Chicago White Sox | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Chicago White Sox | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |