Loading...
Loading...
Evan Sisk
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
2.77
BABIP
0.306
K%
29.4
BB%
8.2
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1.69 | 5.1 | 11 | 5 | 1.88 | 0 |
| 2025 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 4.38 | 12.1 | 14 |
G
17
GS
0
W
0
L
0
ERA
1.71
IP
21.0
SO
25
BB
7
Hits
16
HR
1
WHIP
1.10
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 0.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.86 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 1.2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4.50 |
| 5 |
| 1.30 |
| 1 |
| 2025 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 3.57 | 17.2 | 25 | 10 | 1.47 | 1 |
| 2026 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 1.71 | 21.0 | 25 | 7 | 1.10 | 1 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3.60 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 |