Loading...
Loading...
Ethan Roberts
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
4.28
BABIP
0.174
K%
14.3
BB%
14.3
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 8.22 | 7.2 | 9 | 6 | 2.09 | 3 |
| 2024 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 3.71 | 26.2 | 26 |
G
7
GS
0
W
0
L
0
ERA
0.96
IP
9.1
SO
5
BB
5
Hits
4
HR
0
WHIP
0.96
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Chicago Cubs | 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Chicago Cubs | 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Chicago Cubs | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 10 |
| 1.54 |
| 3 |
| 2025 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 6.00 | 9.0 | 6 | 2 | 1.33 | 3 |
| 2026 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0.96 | 9.1 | 5 | 5 | 0.96 | 0 |
| - | Chicago Cubs | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Chicago Cubs | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |