Loading...
Loading...
Cam Sanders
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
3.33
BABIP
0.318
K%
26.8
BB%
17.1
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 8.10 | 6.2 | 4 | 5 | 2.10 | 2 |
| 2026 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 6.23 | 8.2 | 11 |
G
8
GS
0
W
0
L
0
ERA
6.23
IP
8.2
SO
11
BB
7
Hits
7
HR
0
WHIP
1.62
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 0.2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 54.00 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13.50 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 7 |
| 1.62 |
| 0 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9.00 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10.80 |