Loading...
Loading...
Cody Bradford
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
4.62
BABIP
0.318
K%
11.4
BB%
5.2
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 5.30 | 56.0 | 51 | 12 | 1.21 | 11 |
| 2024 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 3.54 | 76.1 | 70 |
G
10
GS
8
W
0
L
5
ERA
4.30
IP
44.0
SO
22
BB
10
Hits
55
HR
6
WHIP
1.48
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Texas Rangers | 4.1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Texas Rangers | 7.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2.38 |
| - | Texas Rangers | 4.0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2.93 |
| 13 |
| 1.01 |
| 10 |
| 2026 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 4.30 | 44.0 | 22 | 10 | 1.48 | 6 |
| - | Texas Rangers | 5.1 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3.05 |
| - | Texas Rangers | 5.2 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3.42 |