Loading...
Loading...
Carmen Mlodzinski
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
3
BABIP
0.338
K%
20.4
BB%
7.9
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 35 | 3 | 3 | 2.25 | 36.0 | 34 | 18 | 1.28 | 3 |
| 2024 | 40 | 5 | 5 | 3.38 | 50.2 | 46 |
G
10
GS
8
W
4
L
3
ERA
3.96
IP
50.0
SO
44
BB
17
Hits
53
HR
2
WHIP
1.40
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 4.1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 4.15 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 4.2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 4.00 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 5.1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2.51 |
| 19 |
| 1.18 |
| 3 |
| 2025 | 34 | 5 | 8 | 3.55 | 99.0 | 89 | 27 | 1.30 | 8 |
| 2026 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3.96 | 50.0 | 44 | 17 | 1.40 | 2 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 6.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1.77 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 4.1 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 3.28 |