Loading...
Loading...
Lucas Erceg
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
5.4
BABIP
0.331
K%
14.9
BB%
14
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 50 | 4 | 4 | 4.75 | 55.0 | 68 | 36 | 1.58 | 1 |
| 2024 | 38 | 2 | 3 | 3.68 | 36.2 | 41 |
G
52
GS
0
W
4
L
4
ERA
5.59
IP
48.1
SO
34
BB
32
Hits
55
HR
5
WHIP
1.80
SV
13
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Kansas City Royals | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Kansas City Royals | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Kansas City Royals | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 13 |
| 1.20 |
| 3 |
| 2024 | 23 | 0 | 3 | 2.88 | 25.0 | 31 | 3 | 0.84 | 0 |
| 2024 | 61 | 2 | 6 | 3.36 | 61.2 | 72 | 16 | 1.05 | 3 |
| 2025 | 61 | 8 | 4 | 2.64 | 61.1 | 48 | 18 | 1.17 | 4 |
| 2026 | 52 | 4 | 4 | 5.59 | 48.1 | 34 | 32 | 1.80 | 5 |
| - | Kansas City Royals | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.91 |
| - | Kansas City Royals | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |