Loading...
Loading...
Justin Lawrence
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
4.81
BABIP
0.309
K%
23.1
BB%
8.8
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 8.64 | 16.2 | 17 | 19 | 2.40 | 0 |
| 2022 | 38 | 3 | 1 | 5.70 | 42.2 | 48 |
G
21
GS
0
W
0
L
2
ERA
5.59
IP
19.1
SO
21
BB
8
Hits
20
HR
3
WHIP
1.45
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18.00 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 22 |
| 1.55 |
| 3 |
| 2023 | 69 | 4 | 7 | 3.72 | 75.0 | 78 | 36 | 1.35 | 5 |
| 2024 | 56 | 4 | 4 | 6.49 | 59.2 | 45 | 33 | 1.78 | 9 |
| 2025 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0.51 | 17.2 | 23 | 8 | 0.96 | 0 |
| 2026 | 21 | 0 | 2 | 5.59 | 19.1 | 21 | 8 | 1.45 | 3 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Pittsburgh Pirates | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5.79 |