Loading...
Loading...
Nate Pearson
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
3.1
BABIP
0
K%
0
BB%
0
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6.00 | 18.0 | 16 | 13 | 1.50 | 5 |
| 2021 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 4.20 | 15.0 | 20 |
G
1
GS
0
W
0
L
0
ERA
0.00
IP
1.0
SO
0
BB
0
Hits
0
HR
0
WHIP
0.00
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Houston Astros | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 12 |
| 1.73 |
| 2 |
| 2023 | 35 | 5 | 2 | 4.85 | 42.2 | 43 | 18 | 1.27 | 7 |
| 2024 | 41 | 0 | 1 | 5.63 | 40.0 | 51 | 17 | 1.55 | 8 |
| 2024 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 2.73 | 26.1 | 23 | 4 | 0.99 | 4 |
| 2024 | 60 | 2 | 2 | 4.48 | 66.1 | 74 | 21 | 1.33 | 12 |
| 2025 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 9.20 | 14.2 | 7 | 10 | 2.18 | 2 |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |