Loading...
Loading...
Shane McClanahan
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
2.72
BABIP
0.241
K%
25.8
BB%
9.3
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 25 | 10 | 6 | 3.43 | 123.1 | 141 | 37 | 1.27 | 14 |
| 2022 | 28 | 12 | 8 | 2.54 | 166.1 | 194 |
G
9
GS
9
W
5
L
2
ERA
2.82
IP
44.2
SO
47
BB
17
Hits
30
HR
2
WHIP
1.05
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 4.2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3.86 |
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 4.0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 4.15 |
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 5.0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3.95 |
| 38 |
| 0.93 |
| 19 |
| 2023 | 21 | 11 | 2 | 3.29 | 115.0 | 121 | 41 | 1.18 | 15 |
| 2026 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2.82 | 44.2 | 47 | 17 | 1.05 | 2 |
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 4.1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5.00 |
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 5.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 3.91 |