Loading...
Loading...
Cam Booser
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
4.34
BABIP
0.192
K%
27.3
BB%
9.1
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 43 | 2 | 3 | 3.38 | 42.2 | 43 | 16 | 1.34 | 5 |
| 2025 | 39 | 2 | 4 | 5.52 | 31.0 | 35 |
G
11
GS
0
W
0
L
0
ERA
1.59
IP
11.1
SO
12
BB
4
Hits
7
HR
2
WHIP
0.97
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 19 |
| 1.52 |
| 8 |
| 2026 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1.59 | 11.1 | 12 | 4 | 0.97 | 2 |
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 |
| - | Tampa Bay Rays | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 |