Loading...
Loading...
Nathan Eovaldi
For pitchers we lead with FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching — what ERA should be if defense were league average; a 4.00 FIP is roughly average), K% and BB% (strikeout and walk rate per batter faced, the most predictive rate stats for future ERA), and BABIP against (around .300 is neutral; lower often means good defense or weak contact, higher can signal bad luck or hard contact allowed). ERA, WHIP, and raw IP are still here — but FIP tends to be the better predictor of next-season performance.
The radar chart below normalizes each metric so that 100 equals league average; anything above the dotted ring means the player is beating the league, and bigger polygons mean broader excellence. For a full glossary with formulas and worked examples, visit the Learn section. If you want to compare this player head-to-head with another, jump to the Matchup tool.
FIP
4.34
BABIP
0.281
K%
24.2
BB%
5.3
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching — evaluates only pitcher-controlled outcomes
K%: Strikeout rate against opposing batters
BB%: Walk rate against opposing batters
| Season | G | W | L | ERA | IP | SO | BB | WHIP | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 3.63 | 34.2 | 23 | 20 | 1.38 | 2 |
| 2012 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 4.15 | 56.1 | 34 |
G
9
GS
9
W
5
L
4
ERA
3.62
IP
54.2
SO
55
BB
12
Hits
51
HR
10
WHIP
1.15
SV
0
| Date | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Texas Rangers | 4.2 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 9.64 |
| - | Texas Rangers | 4.0 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 11.42 |
| - | Texas Rangers | 6.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 7.98 |
| 20 |
| 1.47 |
| 5 |
| 2012 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 4.43 | 63.0 | 44 | 27 | 1.54 | 5 |
| 2012 | 22 | 4 | 13 | 4.30 | 119.1 | 78 | 47 | 1.51 | 10 |
| 2013 | 18 | 4 | 6 | 3.39 | 106.1 | 78 | 40 | 1.32 | 7 |
| 2014 | 33 | 6 | 14 | 4.37 | 199.2 | 142 | 43 | 1.33 | 14 |
| 2015 | 27 | 14 | 3 | 4.20 | 154.1 | 121 | 49 | 1.45 | 10 |
| 2016 | 24 | 9 | 8 | 4.76 | 124.2 | 97 | 40 | 1.31 | 23 |
| 2018 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 4.26 | 57.0 | 53 | 8 | 0.98 | 11 |
| 2018 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 3.33 | 54.0 | 48 | 12 | 1.28 | 3 |
| 2018 | 22 | 6 | 7 | 3.81 | 111.0 | 101 | 20 | 1.13 | 14 |
| 2019 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 5.99 | 67.2 | 70 | 35 | 1.58 | 16 |
| 2020 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3.72 | 48.1 | 52 | 7 | 1.20 | 8 |
| 2021 | 32 | 11 | 9 | 3.75 | 182.1 | 195 | 35 | 1.19 | 15 |
| 2022 | 20 | 6 | 3 | 3.87 | 109.1 | 103 | 20 | 1.23 | 21 |
| 2023 | 25 | 12 | 5 | 3.63 | 144.0 | 132 | 47 | 1.14 | 15 |
| 2024 | 29 | 12 | 8 | 3.80 | 170.2 | 166 | 42 | 1.11 | 23 |
| 2025 | 22 | 11 | 3 | 1.73 | 130.0 | 129 | 21 | 0.85 | 10 |
| 2026 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 3.62 | 54.2 | 55 | 12 | 1.15 | 10 |
| - | Texas Rangers | 7.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 5.40 |
| - | Texas Rangers | 5.0 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5.06 |